Search for: "Michigan v. United States"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 3,728
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2010, 5:04 am
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 11:47 am
United States, 377 U.S. 201 (1964). [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
The two companies will also pay a combined $3.3 million civil penalty to the United States as well as to Alabama and Louisiana, and $200,000 to Louisiana organ [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:54 pm
United States argument 3/1/2010 Kiyemba v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 6:45 am
United States, 2010 U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:33 am
Reed v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:20 pm
United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 12:55 pm
Plaintiffs, who commenced this action under the CWA's citizen-suit provision, sought declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as civil penalties to be paid to the United States Treasury. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 11:21 am
Smith had failed to establish that the decision of the Michigan Supreme Court “involved an unreasonable application of clearly established Federal law as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States” — the standard of review for habeas petitions after the enactment of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court in Berghuis v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:17 am
Today the United States Supreme Court, in Berghuis v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:13 am
See, e.g., Alschuler & Deiss, A Brief History of the Criminal Jury in the United States, 61 U. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:18 am
Lett, a chance to make sense of their predecessors' decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 10:22 am
The Supreme Court laid it out in a capital case, United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 6:11 am
The controlling Supreme Court precedent is United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 12:55 pm
The Court did decide one case this week, United Student Aid Funds v. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 9:39 am
Michigan has gone from the "first-floor" to the cellar in terms of the quality of court-appointed criminal defense; at least as measured in terms of compensation.The ACLU is challenging the public defender system in the case of Duncan v State of Michigan. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 9:27 am
Michigan has gone from the "first-floor" to the cellar in terms of the quality of court-appointed criminal defense; at least as measured in terms of compensation.The ACLU is challenging the public defender system in the case of Duncan v State of Michigan. [read post]
