Search for: "People v Challenger"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 18,770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2012, 10:57 am
R. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 10:57 am
R. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 12:59 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Koala v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 11:59 am
v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:15 am
In Illinois v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:38 am
More David v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 5:38 am
People v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 10:12 am
In last term’s Sessions v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 5:07 am
People v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:39 am
Monday’s second case is Georgia v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 8:33 pm
Willie Eaton v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:51 pm
CJLF filed an amicus brief in one of the North Dakota cases, Beylund v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 7:51 am
Dominion v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
Ressler v Farrell Fritz, P.C. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:12 am
Let's just take a brief look at some of the findings mentioned by the Ninth Circuit, in an opinion that affirms putting the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation into receivership with respect to medical care for California inmates:"This class action was brought by California prisoners to challenge deficiencies in prison medical care that allegedly violated the Eighth Amendment and the Americans with Disabilities Act. . . . [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:13 am
As a personal side note, there so many great people who have worked on this litigation since it was filed in May, and they all deserve thanks. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:22 pm
Adler v. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 10:43 am
People of color are disproportionately prosecuted for gun crimes, which, in part, prompted the Black Public Defenders Amicus Brief in support of expanding gun rights in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. [read post]
9 May 2015, 7:20 pm
Obama, the Fourth Amendment challenge currently before the Ninth Circuit in which EFF and the ACLU are co-counsel, and Klayman v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
Sarah Andersen, Kelly McKernan, and Karla Ortiz challenge the defendants’ use of images of their artwork, registered with the U.S. [read post]
