Search for: "People v. Givens"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 17,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2016, 7:21 am
Also, its coverage of Oracle v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:50 am
The story is that Associate Justice Harry Blackmun was given authorship of the 7-2 majority opinion in Roe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 5:06 pm
The conclusion reached in the case of Ligue Contre Le Racisme v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 5:55 am
Has enough time passed since the joy of Obergefell v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 9:43 am
Given the requirement of a fair cross section of the community and the prohibition of exclusion of identifiable classes of people from the jury pool, juries weigh not only credibility of witnesses but the fairness of the law. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 2:03 pm
But for the reasons I explained in a previous post, all those Google-supporting amici (the ones on that list and all others) fail to counterbalance the economic weight of those supporting Oracle, and the EFF used FUD to mobilize people and companies for its cause. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 3:36 am
State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:10 pm
In the recent case of London Borough of Hillingdon v Neary [2011] EWHC 413 (COP) the issue of media access to Court of Protection proceedings arose for determination. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 9:10 am
It would make sense that people who are terminally ill and may not have a long time left to live would be given priority to obtain approval for their SSDI benefits, and SSA even has some specific cases where this occurs, but the reality of the situation is that most people, including the terminally ill, have at least six months of waiting before getting approved for benefits. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 5:41 pm
S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2006, 5:42 pm
National Conference of Bar Examiners v. [read post]
Court Rejects Plaintiff's Proposal of Class Notice via Twitter, SMS, and Email -- Jermyn v. Best Buy
22 Dec 2010, 1:53 pm
[Post by Venkat] Jermyn v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 4:23 am
The case- People v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 10:14 am
Given the lack of guidance in the Act, courts have been left to determine this issue. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 10:13 am
As we await the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:15 am
In a media release, the penal reform charity notes that in its experience of working in prisons, carrying out research and representing young people in custody, “segregating vulnerable and disturbed people tends to make their problems worse”. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:13 pm
Its important to remember the the Supreme Court has already ruled that EPA cannot consider cost in selecting a standard (ATA v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, November 05, 2008 US v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:09 am
Stewart v Seward (2007) 148 CA4th 1513. [read post]
