Search for: "People v. House"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 11,274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2024, 9:57 am
” The way forward depends greatly on whether either party wins the presidency and enough down-ballot slots in the House and Senate to achieve a trifecta, i.e., control of both houses of Congress and the White House. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 4:07 pm
I suggest that this puts more of a spin on a bad result for the media than Emperor Hirohito telling the Japanese people that World War II had “not necessarily” turned out to their advantage. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 2:10 am
Aliksanyan
Subscription Required
NEW YORK COUNTYCivil Rights
Co-op Board Violates Fair Housing Act by Refusing Sale of Apartment to Purchaser with Cancer
Hirschmann v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 6:18 pm
The case on which the Comment focuses is People v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 2:58 pm
s house to locate Goodale. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 9:38 am
Various Plaintiffs v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 2:34 pm
For example, in Syvrud v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:39 pm
This is evident in modern day voter suppression, policies that deny Black people fair housing opportunities, redlining practices that perpetuate segregation, legislation such as the Homestead Act, which actively denied economic justice opportunities to Black people, and mass incarceration. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:40 am
The purpose of referring homeless people to the Single Points of Access is to offer specialist preventative and housing options. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:40 am
The purpose of referring homeless people to the Single Points of Access is to offer specialist preventative and housing options. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:59 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
Recently, in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:19 am
Galarneau v. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 4:03 pm
The Fourth Amendment establishes that, "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated . . . ." [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 10:00 am
” If we limit the Article V “We the People” to loyal states, we need neither nationalize it, like Ackerman, nor make it intergenerational, like Colby, nor allow it to be subject to coercion, like Harrison and Amar. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 8:11 am
(Holt v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:29 am
In Soppet v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 4:30 am
People react differently to major stress. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 4:01 am
This issue was addressed recently in the case Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 10:52 am
Chesterfield BC v Bailey is a highly instructive case heard at first instance by Recorder Tilbury in the Derby County Court. [read post]
