Search for: "People v. Story" Results 3041 - 3060 of 9,952
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2024, 5:51 pm by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
  Apparently, the expression has its origins from an 1870 trial in Missouri, Burden v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am by SHG
It is well-settled law that legislative enactments carry a strong presumption of constitutionality (People v Stuart, 100 NY2d 412, 422 [2003); People v Scott, 26 NY2d 286, 291 [1970)) Thus, a party seeking to find a statute unconstitutional bears a heavy burden and “must demonstrate, ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, that the statute suffers from ‘wholesale constitutional impairment'” (People v… [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 3.0) 1. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 10:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  But DiCola sees a v shape: revenue craters and comes back in 1992-93, making the institutional story more complex. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
People that closed on their condos years ago still have not had their punch lists completed. . . . 3. [read post]
16 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
And so the story of secession in the United States is, like most historical stories, highly path dependent. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
GIs are the same thing; terroir is empirically nonexistent, but it’s a story of creating meaning in people’s heads. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 1:04 pm
The images represented some images that might have been constitutionally protected under Ashcroft v. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 9:46 am
  Max Gershweir, who argued the case for Tower, provided the back story. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:53 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Stay tuned over the next year as we share more stories about the current state of indigent defense, fifty years after Gideon v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 11:55 am by David Gans
  Ten months ago, in Shelby County v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 12:20 pm by Trevor Timm
There is some good news: The government had also moved to stay First Unitarian Church v. [read post]