Search for: "People v. Superior Court" Results 3041 - 3060 of 3,635
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2004, 11:36 pm
Many divisions of the Los Angeles Superior Court are taking several months to schedule Superior Court appeals. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:22 am by Phil Dixon
The decision to terminate a person from SBM continues to rest with a superior court judge and not an administrative agency (the Post-Release Supervision and Parole Commission). [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Superior Court, which the California Supreme Court decided in 1998. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The court explored a tricky concept here – there was nothing that was completely on point – relying on Niederlehner v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
It also changed the name of the Native Land Court to the Maori Land Court. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 6:03 pm by Josh Blackman
Also on Thursday, the Supreme Court decided Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:16 pm
The letter read in part: "Because you were a witness in the case of the People v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
I think that oftentimes people refer to infringement as theft in the colloquial sense of the word, but it’s the legal meaning of the term that I will focus on. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:44 pm by Thomas Surmanski
In 2016, Jordan set stricter boundaries and presumptive ceilings – namely 18 months in provincial courts from charge to the end of trial and 30 months for Superior Court (or cases tried in provincial courts after a preliminary inquiry). [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:44 pm by Thomas Surmanski
In 2016, Jordan set stricter boundaries and presumptive ceilings – namely 18 months in provincial courts from charge to the end of trial and 30 months for Superior Court (or cases tried in provincial courts after a preliminary inquiry). [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:10 am by Daniel E. Cummins
This lack of a consistent common law on the issue leaves the bar and trial court judges with great uncertainty on the issue.The Initial PreferenceIt has been about five years since the automobile accident litigation landscape was changed by a 2005 state Supreme Court case, Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 12:51 am
The link to my article is here.The Supreme Court has said as early as 1964, in Kharak Singh and others v. [read post]