Search for: "Personality Productions, Inc." Results 3041 - 3060 of 12,379
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2019, 7:00 am by Bob Ambrogi
It also offers features tailored to specific practice areas, including employment law, immigration law, personal injury, and workers’ compensation. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 7:08 pm by Dennis Crouch
Alumni Research Found. explained that appeals based on vague public interest concerns in invalidating the patent, without a particularized or personal injury, is not enough. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 4:40 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Consequently, businesses and their leaders generally will want to arrange for this work to be protected to the extent by attorney-client privilege, work product and other evidentiary protections against discovery by Department, employees or others for FLSA or other workforce enforcement actions. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 12:34 pm
Trade marksIPwatchdog reports on the hearing in Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 10:57 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
The California statutory law protects use of a person’s name, voice, signature, photograph and likeness for purposes of advertising or selling, or soliciting purchases of products, merchandise, goods or services, without this person’s prior consent. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/49A6gPFQgI 2019-02-19 Facebook Targeted in Scathing Report by British Parliament – The New York Times https://t.co/wyx22ujmuH 2019-02-19 Disinformation and ‘fake news’: Final Report published – News from Parliament – UK Parliament https://t.co/CSNJ2bJfA7 2019-02-19 Key points from parliamentary inquiry into disinformation | Technology | The Guardian https://t.co/vQSDVnXn5j 2019-02-19 Abbotsford man sues Maxime Bernier’s People’s Party over… [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 1:48 pm by karen shephard
For more information on Return Mail, including speakers and a link to the live webcast, click here February 20, 2019: Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 9:50 am by Neumann Law Group
The machine was manufactured by Schechtl Maschinenbau, a German company, and was sold to the man’s employer by MetalForming, Inc., an American company. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 6:09 am
Region Posted by Brianna Ang, Equilar, Inc., on Saturday, February 16, 2019 Tags: Board composition, Boards of Directors, California, Diversity, ESG, Institutional Investors, ISS, Shareholder voting, State law Practical Lessons in Boardroom Leadership Posted by Joseph Mandato, DeNovo Ventures and William Devine, William Devine Esquire, on Saturday, February 16, 2019 Tags: Board dynamics, Board independence, Board… [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am by John Elwood
Midwesco Enterprises, Inc., the Supreme Court held that this Ohio provision imposes an “impermissible burden on commerce” when applied to non-residents, forcing the out-of-state corporation involved there to the choice of either appointing a resident agent in Ohio for service of process or remaining subject to suit in Ohio in perpetuity. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 6:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 572 U.S. 663 (2014) didn’t change the rule that the an ownership claim accrues only once. [read post]