Search for: "Peters v. Doe" Results 3041 - 3060 of 3,583
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2010, 6:40 am by Adam Chandler
Based on Justice Scalia’s questions in last week’s argument in Doe v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Inventive Step) CAFC to hear inequitable conduct case en banc: Theresense, Inc v Becton Dickinson and Co (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Filewrapper) (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas holds ResQNet does not require admission of license agreements arising out of litigation: Fenner v HP (EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report) District Court S D Texas: False marking fine set at point… [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 9:12 am by Anna Christensen
Following up on this week’s arguments – which are expected to be the last of both the Term  and Justice Stevens’ tenure as a Supreme Court Justice – the Seattle Times has local coverage of Doe v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 11:04 am by Sheldon Toplitt
  The latter finding breaks from previous case law in the Garden State, which in 2001 found in Gray v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am by Jay Willis
” Looking ahead, Marcia Coyle of the National Law Journal previews the Term’s remaining cases on the docket for this week, noting that Wednesday’s oral argument in Doe v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
(Spicy IP) ‘Working’ a patent under the Indian Patent Act 1970 – Does importation of a patented invention count? [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:21 pm by Justin Walsh
He does not have the authority to take this cynical, partisan action in the name of the State of Washington,” City Attorney Peter S. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am by James Bickford
  Janet Tu of the Seattle Times discusses Doe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 9:45 am by David
Peter Singer apparently disagrees with me. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 5:28 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Peter Kuck, who went to the Connecticut Department of Public Safety to renew his gun permit. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
Family Partnership (Copyright Litigation Blog) 2nd Circuit: Architectural works: Noninfringement of copyright on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion: Peter F Gaito Architecture, LLC v Simone Development Corp. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:44 pm
Peter asked some highly pertinent questions: can a brand owner define its brands into achieving the status of being prestige or luxurious, or does it depend on objectively verifiable criteria? [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:40 am by Sam E. Antar
Originally, the investors sued InterOil, Mulacek, and Nikiski Partners, which is controlled by Mulacek (Todd Peters, et. al. v. [read post]