Search for: "ROBERTS v. STATE"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 17,007
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2013, 8:36 am
Roberts Facebook Posts Complaining About Supervisor Conduct do Not Support Retaliation Claim – DeBord v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 12:51 pm
In Jesner v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 11:54 am
Robert J. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 11:54 am
Robert J. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 8:00 am
Robert D. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 11:42 am
In Caperton v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 10:42 am
It is consistent with the Roberts Court’s reluctance to subject small-time drug offenders to mandatory removal from the United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 4:07 pm
Roberts, Jr., and Justices Stephen G. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:13 pm
United States and Black v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:58 pm
Federal Rule of Evidence 410 states that Except as otherwise provided in this rule, evidence of the following is not, in any civil or criminal proceeding, admissible against the defendant who made the plea or was a participant in the... [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 10:50 pm
"); United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:00 am
Roberts Jr. agreed with the judgment but also wrote a separate opinion. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am
Kennedy’s swing vote resulted in a few liberal outcomes (notably on same-sex marriage), but Roberts defected from the conservative position only when it came to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which he famously voted to uphold in NFIB v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm
In the absence of such information, the Board rejected Roberts' medical opinion as not credible, which it was entitled to do (see Matter of Glowczynski v Suburban Restoration Co., Inc., 174 AD3d at 1237; Matter of Yanas v Bimbo Bakeries, 134 AD3d 1321, 1321 [2015]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm
In the absence of such information, the Board rejected Roberts' medical opinion as not credible, which it was entitled to do (see Matter of Glowczynski v Suburban Restoration Co., Inc., 174 AD3d at 1237; Matter of Yanas v Bimbo Bakeries, 134 AD3d 1321, 1321 [2015]). [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 7:10 am
The decision below, which held for the United States, is affirmed in a 7-2 opinion by Chief Justice Roberts, available here. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
At oral argument in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:13 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 3:18 pm
State Bd. of Pharmacy v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 2:25 am
In Morrison v. [read post]
