Search for: "Sellers v. State"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 3,989
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
We can't discuss this - at all - because Dechert's in the thick of it, but recently, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court accepted related prescription drug product liability appeals addressing the following issues:Lance, P. v. [read post]
Expert Witness Testimony: The Difference Between Testing Scientific Principles and Determining Cause
17 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
In Dunn v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:54 pm
As the most recent example, see the 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 5:39 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Keithly v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 2:45 pm
The next February, Griffin v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 5:03 am
These provisions do exclude any interpretation of the relevant national legislation that does not ensure effective payment of such fair compensation by a distant seller of media for reproducing such works or other protected subject-matter that targets customers in that Member State unless the seller has already paid comparable compensation in the Member State where the transaction takes place".It's not clear to the IPKat where the ruling, if followed by… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm
By Eric Goldman Network Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:02 am
But the inducement rule focuses on mental state, not marketplace actions—not a good focus. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 10:41 am
which is Title V of the state Environmental Code administered by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:34 am
Here, in Wo Yee Hing Realty Corp. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 6:49 pm
In some states, e.g., North Carolina, see Frances Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
Dowd litigated Bakalar v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:20 am
In doing so, Judge Holwell, by his own account, joined other courts in "rejecting the argument that a domestic transaction occurs whenever the purchaser or seller resides in the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
We are discussing Morrison v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:48 pm
In City Dodge, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:01 pm
See, e.g., Dayton Supply & Tool Company, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 12:09 pm
The Court relied on Donald v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 10:39 am
Her complaint relates to the fact that eBay telephonically confirms sellers, which poses a problem for deaf sellers. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:24 pm
Wyeth v. [read post]
