Search for: "State v. Cooper"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 7,766
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Similarly, petitioner's newly-asserted New York State unspecified constitutional religious freedom argument may not be considered for the first time on reargument, and, in any event, it is unavailing (see Kane v De Blasio, 623 F Supp 3d 339 [SD NY 2022] [City policy requiring workers in school settings to be vaccinated not unconstitutional]). [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Professor Seck has recently been considering ramifications of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 569 U. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 7:50 am
Members of the public are deemed to have knowledge of an agency’s administrative action that has been posted on the Internet Eskridge v Nassau County BOCES, Decisions of the Commissioner Education, Decision No. 16,932Meredith Eskridge appealed the decision of the Board of Cooperative Educational Services of Nassau County [BOCES] denial of her request to be placed on the preferred eligibility list for a position as a teacher of deaf and hard of hearing. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 2:11 pm
The specific state statute, not dissimilar from many States' grandparent visitation laws after the US Supreme Court ruling in Troxel v Granville, states as follows: Cal. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 3:42 am
The defendant in State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
The cover art and subtitle suggest that the narrative is centered on United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:47 am
¶44 (quoting State of Minn. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 8:40 am
As Chief Justice John Roberts put it in last summer’s Carson v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 12:19 pm
” (Weinstock v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 7:20 am
Judge Batchelder’s unanimous opinion (Donald and Cole joining) in Thomas v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:35 pm
Armstrong claims that Defendants further act under color of state law in that, among other things, the charges brought against Mr. [read post]
19 May 2010, 12:39 pm
That's called the Miranda warning, a requirement enshrined into law by the 1966 Supreme Court decision Miranda v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
Nokia’s expert was Prof Marcus Purat and Oppo’s expert was Dr David Cooper. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:02 am
From Cooper v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 11:35 am
If you are interested, you can read more about the rules of professional conduct that govern lawyers in the state of Ohio and the process of filing a complaint against a lawyer (or a judge) here. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:38 am
Cooper. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 3:50 pm
Part 2 includes a summary and analysis of Breona C. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 10:31 am
The State Department would have been required to return the $255 million to the U.S. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:45 am
In Benson v. [read post]
