Search for: "State v. F. T." Results 3041 - 3060 of 18,400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
For those topics, readers can go here and here (punitive damages class actions), here and here (territoriality - one state can't impose punitives for conduct in different states), here (ratio), and here (conduct directed against nonparties). [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 1:34 pm
He argues of human individuals that (a) they are resourceful and goal-motivated; (b) they are constrained and confronted with scarcity of time, energy, and resources; (c) they form expectations and learn; (d) they differentially value distinct states of the world; (e) they are motivated to achieve; (f) in novel situations, they search for the proper frame for the event in their reservoir of know event types. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
 The courts ultimately said “no,” see Abigail Alliance v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695 (D.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:38 am
In re Henriksen, 399 F.2d 253, 254 (C.C.P.A. 1968); see also In re Hogan, 559 F.2d 595, 604 n.13 (C.C.P.A. 1977)(finding that "a limit upon continuing applications is a matter of policy for the Congress"). [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Comr., 643 F.2d 1383 (9th Cir. 1981), stated, “Petitioners’ first argument, that tops are not income is wholly without merit. [read post]