Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 3041 - 3060 of 9,084
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, prospective AI Supreme Court Justices should be measured against the quality of the average candidates for the job—generally experienced, respected appellate judges—rather than against the quality of the average candidate for state trial court. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:14 am by Florian Mueller
Issa would also like the district court to adjudicate the FTC's antitrust case now. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am by William Ford
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 11:14 am by Mark Tabakman
The Court stated that “in so holding, we are persuaded by our prior precedent and the Second Circuit’s well-reasoned decision in [Myers v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 5:08 am by SHG
That latter proposition is supported by decisions of this Court, see United States v. [read post]
Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) – On November 13, the Supreme Court agreed to decide whether the Hobbs Act (also known as the Administrative Orders Review Act) requires the district court to accept the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) interpretation of the TCPA, in PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am by William Ford
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm by familoo
  First of all, it is important to understand what a judgment is. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 3:20 pm by Robert Kreisman
Capital Fitness, Inc. d/b/a XSport Fitness, et al., No. 2-17-1035 (Appellate Court of Illinois, Second Judicial District). [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm by MOTP
Appeal from the 241st Judicial District Court, Smith County, Texas.Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 7:07 am by Elizabeth McCuskey
The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated these individual suits into a multi-district litigation (MDL), as it often does. [read post]