Search for: "State v. Law" Results 3041 - 3060 of 173,888
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2011, 9:32 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Second, to the extent there is some doubt under state law as to an officer's or agency's power to sue, or any other state-law issue that may be dispositive, federal courts should abstain under Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:06 am by Steven D. Schwinn
Ginsberg, the case testing wether the federal Airline Deregulation Act preempts a state-law claim for breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing arising out of an... [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 2:38 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In its extensive opinion in Hodes & Nauser v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 5:41 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a 57 page opinion today in Latter v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 8:03 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School A unanimous Supreme Court ruled today in Evenwel v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 1:00 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In an Order in Georgia Coalition for the People's Agenda v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:19 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a closely-divided opinion, with the majority written by Justice Kennedy, the Court has decided that the Fourteenth Amendment requires states to license same-sex marriages in Obergefell v.... [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 8:44 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In its divided opinion in Manhattan Community Access Corporation v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 7:50 am by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School The Court will hear oral arguments on Monday in Whittman v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm
  (Full disclosure:  One of the other exemptions to the MCLE requirement is for full-time law professors, an exemption from which I derive substantial satisfaction.)The trial court agreed with Mr. [read post]