Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 13,235
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm
The retirement has been announced of the distinguished media law silk, James Price QC. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 3:30 pm
The volume’s editors (Arizona State University’s David H. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
In Eisenstadt v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 4:19 am
” [But read below] “Second Counterclaim: Judiciary Law § 487 To state a cause of action for violation of Judiciary Law § 487, a party must plead intentional deceit and damages proximately caused by the deceit (Judiciary Law§ 487; Jean v Chinitz, 163 AD3d 497, 497 [1st Dept 2018]). [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 11:00 am
This poses a big challenge to insurers to introduce a new product and price it properly. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 10:18 am
Case citation: State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 8:51 am
(Ticketmaster L.L.C. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 7:05 am
PeaceHealth, [...] (9th Cir. 2007) (stating that the Supreme Court's predatory pricing decisions have not 'go[ne] so far as to hold that in every case in which a plaintiff challenges low prices as exclusionary conduct[,] the plaintiff must prove that those prices were below cost'). [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 1:51 pm
Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:46 am
It reasoned that this type of clause is integral to pricing and risk allocation between commercial parties, citing Lewison LJ’s dictum in Interactive E-Solutions JLT v O3B Africa Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 62 with approval. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 12:18 pm
The court notes that Wiley stated that he used the Internet and called supply houses to investigate the pricing of materials. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court’s landmark case Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 1:55 pm
Havis persists: Part III — United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 1:55 pm
Havis persists: Part III — United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 5:32 pm
The case demonstrates the vital importance of class actions in achieving justice when consumers are ripped off.A team led by Oregon attorney David Sugerman brought a class action—Scharfstein v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
In Apple v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 10:18 am
The RIA’s traders were accused of intentionally marking their bond prices below market value to maximize yield and allow them to sell for a profit when needed, in violation of GAAP. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:15 am
See State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm
More recently, Gregory Shill of the University of Iowa College of Law describes in The Atlantic how the law effectively compels the use of the automobile, repeating the 1977 SCOTUS reference in Wooley v. [read post]
