Search for: "State v. R. G."
Results 3041 - 3060
of 4,530
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2011, 1:42 pm
Smith (R-TX) on March 30, 2011. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
However, the Fourth District Appellate Court, in Clark v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:02 am
R (on the application of G) v The Governors of X School [2011] UKSC 30 – Read judgment On 4 October 2007 the parents of a 15 year old boy complained that he had been kissed by his 22 year old school sessional music teaching assistant (G). [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm
REV. 823, 824–25 (2010); Steven G. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 1:42 pm
Patrick G. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 1:28 pm
The privilege is set forth in G. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 7:00 am
" (Code of Civil Procedure section 1856, subdivision (g).) [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
What are the lessons learned so far from the O104:H4 outbreak? [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:50 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 10:28 am
R. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:22 am
§ 405(g). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:01 am
Citing the well-known “no more, but certainly no less” dictum of Lord Bingham in R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] 2 AC 323, he said: So far as this Court is concerned, that would involve marching ahead of what Strasbourg jurisprudence has established. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 12:31 pm
The case is Turner v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 1:50 am
Regina (G) v Governors of X School (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) [2011] UKSC 30; [2011] WLR (D) 211 “A teaching assistant accused of acts of abuse of trust with a pupil was not entitled to legal representation in school disciplinary proceedings which might lead to a referral to the Independent Safeguarding Authority, which could bar him from working with children. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:09 am
R (on the application of G) (Respondent) v The Governors of X School (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 30 – Read judgment / press summary The Supreme Court has ruled unanimously that Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the right to a fair trial, is engaged in internal disciplinary proceedings if the will have a “substantial influence” on future proceedings which are likely to determine a civil right. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:36 am
Oakland Heritage Alliance v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:33 am
” http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/836779.no2.pdf State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:14 am
Board of Trustees of California State University (2011) 193 Cal.App.4th 675.)IS IT A PROJECT? [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:58 am
” The court then held that the penalty of terminating the teacher from her position “could not be construed as disproportionate to the challenged conduct, inasmuch as CBA Article 21(G)(6) explicitly called for "mandatory" termination in cases of sexual misconduct. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
