Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 3041 - 3060 of 57,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
Hendrix said in his opinion that the guidance discards EMTALA’s requirement to consider the welfare of unborn children when determining how to stabilize a pregnant woman, claims to preempt state law without explicit provisions to the contrary, and interferes with the practice of medicine in violation of the Medicare Act. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 1:45 pm by Evangelina Cantu
In the EPA’s August 29 news release announcing this new rule, the EPA said, “The amendments issued today are limited and change only parts of the 2023 rule that are invalid under the Sackett v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 4:10 am
Zone Sergeant's violation of a Division of State Police regulation and bringing discredit upon the Division justifies her demotion to SergeantMatter of Revella v Felton, 2009 NY Slip Op 01753, Decided on March 12, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentChristine A. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 12:59 am
Zone Sergeant's violation of a Division of State Police regulation and bringing discredit upon the Division justifies her demotion to SergeantMatter of Revella v Felton, 60 AD3d 1184Christine A. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:02 am
”* The Commissioner said that the Board of Regents "does not have the ability" to reject or veto a “recommendation” of another charter entity or modify a proposed charter submitted by such entity, citing Bd. of Educ. of the Roosevelt UFSD., et al. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:03 am by Prof. Brian Kalt, guest-blogging
Brian Kalt, guest-blogging) In my first post I said that my “cliffhangers” range from the merely interesting all the way up to full-blown constitutional crises. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 2:22 pm by Ilya Somin
The first was that sanctuaries beat the administration at the Supreme Court in June of that year; technically, the justices declined to hear United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:21 am
Chief Justice John Roberts said the state court decision has to be considered by the federal courts. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 10:12 am
., San Luis Obispo Mothers For Peace, the State of New York, and amicus State of California (Petitioners) challenge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC or Commission) modification of the Design Basis Threat (DBT) rule and partial denial of the Committee to Bridge the Gap's (CBG) petition for rulemaking. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:07 pm by Mark Ashton
The implications can be said to be national in scope as individual states step forward with their own interpretations of  Dobbs v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 8:38 am
  That said, I suspect that lots of state prosecutors ought to share the local DA's concern that this ruling in Miller v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 8:38 am
  That said, I suspect that lots of state prosecutors ought to share the local DA's concern that this ruling in Miller v. [read post]