Search for: "State v. Seven" Results 3041 - 3060 of 11,122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2008, 8:55 am
Rees (07-5439), that the lethal injection method is not unconstitutional at least as used in that state, it has not acted on any formal plea by a state for a chance to resume executions although it has denied review of inmate appeals from seven states. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:35 pm by Ben Cheng
ThalerDocket: 11-1391Issue(s): Whether Texas’s use of the In re Briseno factors -- under which Texas assesses mental retardation using seven factors invented by the state court that rely heavily on the facts of the crime, have no basis in scientific literature, and conflict with the nationally-accepted clinical definition of mental retardation relied on in Atkins v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
At Reason (via How Appealing), Damon Root looks at the federal government’s cert petition in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:31 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
For the first six or seven years, he worked as an installer of kitchen cabinets. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 11:07 am by Robert Wagner
The Court Finds the Composition Claims Are Patentable Subject Matter Before making its determination, the Court traced the state of the law regarding § 101 by looking at the Supreme Court’s decisions in Diamond v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:29 am by John Elwood
And worst of all, the court denied the big knot of seven state tax retroactivity cases that was on its fourth relist. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 6:50 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This was also an issue in the 1892 United States Supreme Court case, Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
It has been a little over seven years since 15-year-old Sergio Hernandez was shot by Jesus Mesa, a U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
Nokia v Oppo [2023] EWHC 23 (Pat) In a new development in the global dispute between Nokia and Oppo that spans seven jurisdictions across Europe and Asia, Mr Justice Meade of the English Patents Court has found that smartphone manufacturer Oppo infringes valid and standard essential Nokia 4G/5G patent EP2981103 on an “allocation of preamble sequences”. [read post]