Search for: "State v. So " Results 3041 - 3060 of 117,849
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2010, 9:56 am by Jon
The case of Jefferson Wayne Schrader and Second Amendment Foundation v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:25 pm
State Ethics Commission is not required to show an individual knowing and intentional engaged in prohibited post-public employment conductMatter of Gormley v New York State Ethics Commn., 2008 NY Slip Op 09245, decided on November 24, 2008, Court of AppealsThe issue before the Court of Appeals: Does Public Officers Law §73(18) required the New York State Ethics Commission to prove that an individual knew the alleged offending conduct was prohibited… [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
Reddy's Laboratories v Eli Lilly [2009] EWCA Civ 1362 where the judge, having reviewed the EPO jurisprudence on obviousness including Agrevo T 0939/92 stated: "The EPO jurisprudence is founded firmly around a fundamental question: has a patentee made a novel non-obvious technical advance and provided sufficient justification for it to be credible? [read post]
11 May 2022, 11:32 am by Jessica Arons
There are some things we don’t know about the leaked Supreme Court opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:50 am by William Eskridge - Guest
  In 1954, three-fifths of the states barred such marriages; by 1967, only southern states did so. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:12 am by SO Issues
Appellant argues on appeal that the trial court erred in so doing. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 10:26 pm by Mark Engstrom
The judgment of the district court was vacated and the case was remanded so the district court could determine whether personal jurisdiction would be reasonable and fair (Polar Electro Oy v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 10:52 am by Josh Blackman
Just as one may withdraw authority from an agent before the interest of a third party vests, so may the state legislature withdraw authority from Congress before the two-thirds threshold is reached. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 5:09 pm
Continuing in catch up mode, On Monday The Supreme Court agreed to hear District Attorney's Office v. [read post]