Search for: "Study v. State" Results 3041 - 3060 of 15,008
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
The right wing think tank, the Centre for Policy Studies, has released a report Safety without Censorship: A better way to tackle online harms [pdf] suggesting that online harms legislation will seriously undermine freedom of expression. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 3:05 pm by Richard Hunt
Second, the number of years is in dispute in light of the BJS study discussed above. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:31 pm by Adam Feldman
Conversely, Barrett authored an opinion coded as “liberal” in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Once this system takes hold, it forms a true equilibrium from which only oddball states (Maine and Nebraska) will depart. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm by Shannon Hill
In 2014, researchers at Hewlett Packard published a study on the security of 10 popular IoT devices that identified hundreds of vulnerabilities, including lack of transport encryption, insecure firmware updates, and poorly protected access credentials. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 2:33 pm by Heather Douglas
” – Justice Scalia in Holland v Illinois. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
At that point, the culture war over same-sex marriage had begun in earnest: Goodridge v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 5:31 am by Joe Consumer
Montana Eighth Judicial District and Ford Motor Company v. [read post]
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drough [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 7:13 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In discussing the best interests of the child in Young v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 3:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
In general, courts evaluate the validity of a law that regulates expressive conduct under the standard articulated in United States v. [read post]