Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor" Results 3041 - 3060 of 4,755
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2011, 11:56 am
The judge, Justice Bennett, considered the application utilising the principles laid down by Gummow and Hayne JJ in Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O’Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57 at [65], quoting Beecham Group Ltd v Bristol Laboratories Pty Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 618 at 622-623 (per Kitto, Taylor, Menzies and Owen JJ), and accordingly asked whether the plaintiff had: (1) made out a prima facie case; and (2) addressed where the balance of convenience lay? [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 7:19 am by sue.altmeyer@law.csuohio.edu
Ternus, former Chief Justice, Iowa Supreme Court, ousted after the court's decision in Varnum v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 2:59 am
The agency also announced a new goal: to eliminate V. vulnificus illnesses as fully as possible, thus replacing its old objective of reducing them by 60 percent. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm by Andrew Tidwell-Neal
In a decision handed down on October 6, 2011, the Illinois Supreme Court clarified a doctrine known as the "silent witness theory. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:59 am by Rob Robinson
http://bit.ly/nWotnF (Jeffrey Klein, Nicolas Pappas) ECPA Protects Non-Citizen Communications Stored in the US – Suzlon Energy v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am by Marie Louise
(Patents Post-Grant) AUTM survey shows significant increases in university patent filings and issuances in FY2010 (Patent Docs) Pending Supreme Court and en banc Federal Circuit patent cases (Patently-O)   US Patents – Decisions Shift in grounds of USPTO reexamination rejection examined by CAFC: In re Stepan Company (Patents Post-Grant) (IPBiz) CAFC tackles “consisting of” in In re Taylor (IPBiz) Federal Circuit affirms limits on using litigation expenses to meet… [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:09 am by WSLL
Young, Faculty Director, Prosecution Assistance Program; and Joshua Beau Taylor, Student Director.Date of Decision: October 4, 2011Facts: After a bench trial, the district court held Appellant in criminal contempt, due to his failure to comply with the terms of a dispositional order entered in a juvenile case. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:30 am by jrvann
  In the recent North Carolina Court of Appeals case, Taylor v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:20 am
Last week's AIPPI UK event, kindly hosted in the smart new London office of Taylor Wessing, was entitled "Are you sitting comfortably? [read post]