Search for: "Trade Secret Inc." Results 3041 - 3060 of 4,056
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2011, 11:56 am
" Claims are also alleged for copyright infringement, trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, conversion, unfair competition, and for declaratory relief. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 5:29 pm by Scott Koller
Enea TekSci, Inc., 2010 WL 546140 (S.D.Cal.,2010), testimony from a damages expert in a misappropriation of trade secrets case was found to be unreliable because it rested on a number of unfounded assumptions. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 12:45 pm by Holland & Hart
  In a very recent case, Wesco Autobody Supply, Inc. v Ernest, the Idaho Supreme Court recited this language from a prior decision: [T]he legislature did not intend the [Idaho Trade Secrets Act] to be read so broadly as to preclude the hiring of an employee from a competitor; the legislature also did not intend that merely hiring a competitor's employee constitutes acquiring a trade secret. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 12:08 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
The newspaper also argued that Delaware’s Freedom of Information Act requires disclosure and that there was no trade secret otherwise entitled to confidential treatment. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:02 pm by Gene Quinn
For example, consider that you are operating Home Cleaning Business, Inc.. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 3:35 pm
As a result muggles' trade marks and patent registration offices all over Europe are seriously flooded with silly applications. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:31 pm
Our Chicago trade secrets attorneys were interested to see a recent trade secrets lawsuit coming from the high-dollar world of professional sports. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 7:48 am
It's no secret that the US Congress and many in the Obama administration have been somewhat obsessed with US-China trade over the last few years, and considering that China is a rising economic power and one of the United States' largest trading partners, a certain amount of US government attention is arguably warranted. [read post]