Search for: "United States v. Long" Results 3041 - 3060 of 21,207
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  It is a question that has come before the United States Supreme Court on two prior occasions: When can a state require an out-of-state seller to collect and remit sales tax? [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:48 am by Famighetti & Weinick
The right to freedom of speech is a core value guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:51 am by SHG
Georgia, 461 U.S. 660, 671 (1983), the Supreme Court of the United States stated that the due process and equal protection principles of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States prohibit ‘‘punishing a person for his poverty. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
It was not because nationals other Member States may qualify for the Credit in question (Lord Hope, giving the main judgment, states in terms that “had a right to reside in the United Kingdom…been the sole condition of entitlement to state pension credit, it would without doubt have been directly discriminatory on grounds of nationality”: para 26); it was because not all UK nationals would be able to meet the test of habitual residence… [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:28 am by Katherine Cook
On December 31, 2020, the Florida Supreme Court issued an opinion, adopting the federal court’s summary judgment standard as articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Anderson v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:24 pm by William Birdthistle
  (The prospectuses of Janus mutual funds stated that market timing was prohibited; meanwhile, Janus allegedly accepted payments from hedge funds to market-time those funds and thus to siphon returns from long-term investors.) [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Julian Ku
Instead, Chief Justice Roberts emphasized that “United States Law…does not rule the world,” a phrase he first used in his opinion for the Court in Kiobel v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Therefore, in interpreting and applying this Code section, the courts of this state may draw from the opinions ofthe United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]