Search for: "United States v. Washington" Results 3041 - 3060 of 10,164
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices held that a judge’s simultaneous service on two military courts does not violate the dual-officeholder ban. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Mark Walsh
Amex was sued by the United States and several states, who argued that the anti-steering provisions in its contracts with merchants violate federal antitrust law. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:16 am by Aditya Bamzai
” That principle was at stake in Ortiz because the Supreme Court has also recognized (in an 1894 case called United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Naomi Cahn looks at Sveen v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Rulings IPSO has published a single resolution statement and series of rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 03262-18 Stein v The Herald, resolved by IPSO mediation 01724-18 Nightingale v Mail Online, no breach of the IPSO code 01108-18 Mike Ashley and Sports Direct v The Times, breach of provision 1 (Accuracy) 01066-18 Gabriel v The Sun, no breach of the IPSO code 01065-18 Gabriel v Daily Star, no breach of the IPSO code 01064-18… [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 2:24 pm by Jon Levitan
United States</em> appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 5:57 am by Alan Morrison
In her majority opinion, Justice Elena Kagan held that administrative law judges are officers of the United States, not employees, and so they have to be appointed under the Constitution’s appointments clause. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court ruled 5-4 that stock options are not taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-7793 Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 3:20 pm by Mark Walsh
United States, a case about whether employee stock options are taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act of 1937. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
I was expecting the worst when I saw the caption Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court held on Monday that a decision not to grant a proportional sentence reduction does not require a detailed written explanation. [read post]