Search for: "BARRETT"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 6,527
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2020, 1:10 pm
“Some Republicans feel protected by 6-3 Supreme Court, even if Biden wins; ‘We have no fears because there’s a conservative Supreme Court now,’ one Trump supporter in Arizona says after 48-year-old Amy Coney Barrett’s appointment”: Sahil Kapur of NBC News has this report. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 12:58 pm
Like several of her colleagues, Barrett homed in on Section 231g and the apparent difficulties it created for Salinas’ position. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 7:20 am
The Bone case is reminiscent of a 2019 case decided by recently appointed Supreme Court Justice, Amy Coney Barrett, when she sat on the U.S. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 7:16 am
The justices, which may by then include Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett, will consider the following questions: (1) Whether a group of states and local governments have standing under Article III of the Constitution to challenge a July 21, 2020, memorandum by President Donald Trump instructing the secretary of commerce to include in his report on the 2020 census information enabling the president to exclude noncitizens from the base population number for purposes of apportioning… [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 6:30 am
Here’s a round-up of other Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Justice Barrett Joins Supreme Court Arguments For The First Time (Nina Totenberg, NPR) Supreme Court, with Justice Barrett, to hear major LGBT rights case day after election (Tucker Higgins, CNBC) Has the Court Learned Nothing From Bush v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
As state courts and officials in Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Minnesota, Texas and elsewhere modify state election rules to accommodate the unprecedented challenges that COVID-19 has presented, some argue that their actions are unconstitutional.[2] Justice Amy Coney Barrett has not yet weighed in on the issue, and the remaining Justices appear to be evenly divided.[3] As an originalist matter, the Supreme Court should stay out of these cases. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
As state courts and officials in Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Minnesota, Texas and elsewhere modify state election rules to accommodate the unprecedented challenges that COVID-19 has presented, some argue that their actions are unconstitutional.[2] Justice Amy Coney Barrett has not yet weighed in on the issue, and the remaining Justices appear to be evenly divided.[3] As an originalist matter, the Supreme Court should stay out of these cases. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Wade that Trump hopes he has secured by appointing three extreme anti-abortion conservatives to the Supreme Court (Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett). [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
On the night of July 6, 1988, Mexico was on the verge of the unthinkable. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 7:38 pm
WASHINGTON — She didn’t have to wear a black robe or even be in Washington, but Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined her new colleagues at the Supreme Court on Monday to hear arguments for the first time. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 7:21 pm
In Taylor, a 7-1 majority (the just-confirmed new Justice Amy Coney Barrett did not participate), concluded that the lower court had gone too far in granting qualified immunity to prison officials in an egregious case where they subjected a prisoner to horrific treatment: …Trent Taylor is an inmate in the custody of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 5:50 pm
” Alex Swoyer of The Washington Times has reports headlined “Supreme Court sides with Black Lives Matter activist over injured police officer” and “Justice Amy Coney Barrett hears her first case since confirmation. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 2:48 pm
First Amendment Punt: The Supreme Court hasn't banned the First Amendment yet, but once Amy Coney Barrett learns what it says they'll surely revisit it. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 12:04 pm
Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the Court’s newest member, did not participate in the consideration or decision of the case. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 11:50 am
Despite the seeming resolution of those issues eight and five years ago, respectively, both have reemerged as hot-button topics in this year’s presidential election and the recent confirmation hearings for Justice Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 11:45 am
Barrett may not turn many heads, her full name, Ruth Shalit Barrett, may well. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 11:34 am
“Trump’s appointee Barrett takes part in first Supreme Court arguments”: Lawrence Hurley of Reuters has this report. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 11:14 am
Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who joined the bench just last week, did not participate in the case. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 10:31 am
Don’t look now, but as of Oct. 12, the United States may—and the word “may” requires no small emphasis here—have entered the last hundred days of Donald Trump’s presidency. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 10:30 am
It attracted even broader interest as newly confirmed Justice Amy Coney Barrett sat for oral argument for the first time.Hearing the case remotely, Barrett and her colleagues pressed both sides to explain what legal test the high court should apply when deciding whether draft documents are subject to public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. [read post]
