Search for: "Beach v. State" Results 3061 - 3080 of 3,884
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2011, 9:26 am
As of the time of this entry, at least 20 agencies have adopted such arrangements, from Palm Desert and Cathedral City to Long Beach, from Riverside County to Sonoma County. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 9:35 am by Carter Wood
FBL Financial: The History, Current State, and Future for the Cause of Action -- Matthew S. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:35 am by Kelly
(IPBiz) Australia Patentology Newsbytes – including Uniloc’s Aussie inventor responds to appeal decision in Microsoft case (Patentology) Canada Supreme Court will lead tech law in 2011 (Michael Geist) Apps, Bots and Workarounds – Part 2: Research in Motion Ltd. v Kik Interactive Inc (IPblog) Apps, Bots and Workarounds – Part 3: Fraser Beach v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 9:36 am by Sherri Johnson
  Another court denied an exemption to the Palm Beach Community Church for 47 acres on which it had planned to build a church. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 9:36 am by Sherri Johnson
  Another court denied an exemption to the Palm Beach Community Church for 47 acres on which it had planned to build a church. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 5:13 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Hackensack, NJ lawyer Jay McDaniel on his New Jersey Business Dissolution Journal Key Trends in eDiscovery for 2011 - David Kaufer of TERIS on the firm's Sophisticated Litigation Support Blog Another Twombly/Iqbal Victory for Plaintiffs: SCOTUS Denies Certiorari for Digital Music Price-Fixing Case - Philadelphia attorney Maxwell Kennerly of The Beasley Firm at his blog, Litigation & Trial Loss Causation - Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. v… [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:26 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Starting at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, January 12, 2011, the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments in Pavsek v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 12:57 am
NYPPL believes that solutions can be developed that would be consistent with the mandates of the State Constitution. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In granting the motion, the court determined, inter alia, that defendants established as a matter of law that plaintiff is unable to prove that defendants' [*2]negligence is a proximate cause of plaintiff's damages (see Robbins v Harris Beach & Wilcox, 291 AD2d 797, 798). [read post]