Search for: "CHANCE v. STATE"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 12,121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2017, 5:14 am
King doesn’t get the chance to fool you here. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 10:30 am
Today the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Hall v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:27 am
In 2005, in Roper v. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 8:17 am
., colour marks and 3D marks) (MHCS v EUIPO | Case T-274/20 and Guerlain v EUIPO | Case T-488/20), the risks of using a mark in a manner other than that registered (Fashioneast Sàrl v EUIPO | Case T-297/20) and taking unfair advantage of the reputation of a well-known mark (Asolo Ltd. v EUIPO | Case T-509/19) and the importance of presenting valid arguments for the existence of a link between the marks - even in the case of marks with an exceptional… [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 6:55 am
Gadbois v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 11:17 pm
The State of Texas claims that the score of 61 was obtained on an aberrant test and that his real IQ is over 70. (100 is average) In Atkins v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:24 pm
Graham and Sullivan v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 7:34 am
Compare Bowers v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 pm
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court recently decided State of Maine v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 2:41 pm
Shaddy v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:53 am
Stay tuned over the next year as we share more stories about the current state of indigent defense, fifty years after Gideon v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
To the relief of many, last year in Turner v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 9:08 pm
See Sterling v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:41 am
With respect to due process, “[a] non-domiciliary tortfeasor has minimum contacts with the forum State . . . if it purposefully avails itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum State” (LaMarca, 95 NY2d at 216 [internal quotations marks and citations omitted]),“thus invoking the benefits and protections of [the forum state’s] laws” (Hanson v Denckla, 357 US 235, 253 [1958]). [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 8:19 am
As a result I decided to post a series of Special Ed Law 101 articles to give those outside the SpEd (special education) circle a better chance of understanding what we mean. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:37 am
[ii] Appellant’s Opening Brief, Chance v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:26 am
Last month, the Fourth Circuit in Family Health Physical Medicine, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:26 am
Last month, the Fourth Circuit in Family Health Physical Medicine, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:26 am
Last month, the Fourth Circuit in Family Health Physical Medicine, LLC v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 2:45 pm
The Ninth Circuit Court has ruled that the Second Amendment also applies to state, county and city government (Nordyke v. [read post]