Search for: "CUSTODY OF D T"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 3,660
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2009, 5:30 am
 They'd better, since Ates seems to be getting slimmer and so less convincing all the time. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:52 pm
This post isn’t about child custody cases. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 11:45 am
Circuit Court officials said they couldn't tell me about the child custody case because it was a juvenile case; a search on Odyssey doesn't turn up the case. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:40 am
[T]he evidence adduced clearly showed that Rosetta was dead before defendant left the scene. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 2:52 pm
He stated that some clients would ask him when was the last time he'd had an exam, and he'd give them the date… He stated that reconciling records with DTC was something they "should've done in ‘06. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 12:44 pm
D), in which Brinton describes the steps he took to examine computers seized during a search of defendant's residence. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 6:28 am
They may not have come from the client’s friends or family, but I certainly couldn’t provide a complete chain of custody for them. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 5:40 am
" And it isn't. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 5:40 am
" And it isn't. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 8:05 pm
If so, I'd probably have referred the case, he said. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 4:45 am
Victoria D., 22, and Felicia M., 21 (hereinafter collectively, the "Defendants") were in a car Saturday. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 7:15 am
Of course, it isn’t our fault. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 3:26 am
The trial court held that he wasn’t responsible for the care, custody, or control of children, so the statute didn’t apply to him. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 3:05 pm
It isn’t, and the judge was wrong. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:17 am
And people often don’t realize that seemingly harmless statements can often prove very damaging at trial. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 3:32 pm
He didn't want to be limited to only visiting his children because he was worried that it'd make his children distant. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm
Back on September 1, the record label plaintiffs in the Joel Tenenbaum case filed a motion for entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 58(d). [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
Further, Colvin noted that sponsors should not input fiscal sponsorship information on Schedule D, Part IV (Trust, Escrow, and Custodial Arrangements).Sponsors should consider whether project managers may fall under the definition of key employees. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 2:55 am
A new judge had taken over from the one who'd heard the case, and granted the motion, sentencing him to ten years, then granting judicial release; this was done with the local prosecutor specifically stipulating that he had no objection to it. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 2:22 am
And if they hadn't found him for 31 years, they'd probably have forgotten all about it. [read post]
