Search for: "Call v. Heard" Results 3061 - 3080 of 8,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
On 9 February 2018, Nicklin J heard an application in the case of JMO v KTA. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On Thursday 27 June 2019 Julian Knowles J handed judgment in the case of Bull v Desporte (heard 25 to 28 March 2019). [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 12:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In determining whether the sworn juror is "grossly unqualified," the court must, "[i]n a probing and tactful inquiry, . . . evaluate the nature of what the juror has seen, heard, or has [*5]acquired knowledge of, and assess its importance and its bearing on the case" (People v Buford, 69 NY2d 290, 299 [1987]). [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals regarding important expert testimony requires the appellate court to order a new trial, regardless of whether there was actually any substantive error in the expert testimony heard or not heard by the jury. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Since the beginning of the pandemic, we have heard increasingly from SRLs with cognitive disabilities about their lack of accommodation from the courts. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
France The Press Gazette has covered calls for an investigation into reports that the police are targeting journalists at “Gilets Jaunes” protests in France. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:02 am by Administrator
Li, 2019 BCCA 344; 2020 SCC 12(38903) Appeal heard by video-conference 06/11/20. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:26 am
The motion was called on June 2, 2014. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:23 pm by Dean Gonsowski
”  Custodian based collections have been discussed recently as being under fire in blogs and other recent cases such as Pension Committee and Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 11:44 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument in Seila Law. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
  Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 29 and 30 November [read post]