Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 3061 - 3080 of 16,698
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2011, 11:19 am
Yet when it comes to privacy, the cross-Atlantic harmony breaks down. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:29 am
  But I will note that in Commonwealth of Virginia v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 2:31 pm
It was thus permissible for Fresno State to impose discipline on O’Brien for this conduct under its reasonable and viewpoint-neutral regulation. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 2:21 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
She was only 13 and attempting to cross a relatively major road with a 60mph speed limit, after dusk and without street lights, was not straightforward even for an adult. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:40 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Maintenance obligations are covered by their own inter-state jurisdiction regime set out in the Maintenance Regulation. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 2:51 am by Thalia Kruger
Such modes of service where the defendant is likely to be domiciled in another state have been condemned as insufficient by the ECJ in cases such as: Case 166/80 Peter Klomps v Karl Michel [1981] ECR 1593; Case C-300/14 Imtech Marine Belgium NV v Radio Hellenic SA ECLI:EU:C:2015:825; Case C-289/17 Collect Inkasso OU v Aint 2018 EU:C:2018. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
Accordingly, defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's fifth cause of action should have been granted (see Continental Med., P.C. v Mercury Cas. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:53 am by CMS
The appeal in the matter of Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE has been adjusted in listing this week and will now commence from 10am tomorrow, Wednesday 13 May 2020. [read post]
26 May 2021, 3:26 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Haaland (National Historic Preservation Act; Religious Freedom Restoration Act)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html Petitioner/Cross-Respondent: The People of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of Minor Children: K.C. and L.C., v. [read post]