Search for: "DOE v. Smith" Results 3061 - 3080 of 6,569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
 Never too late 39 [week ending Sunday 29 March] – Merpel writes to the EPO AC | CJEU and hyperlinks | New gTLD regime | AG on TM reputation and genuine use in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV | AMBA speaks | Digital exhaustion | CJEU on linking to live shows in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment| EPO Enlarged Board on amendments’ clarity in G 3/14 | EPO on patentability in cases G 2/12… [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
” At Ikuta Matata, Sean Smith wonders whether “Bucklew signal[s] a newly invigorated role for originalism in Eighth Amendment interpretation. [read post]
14 May 2009, 6:15 am
That is, in my view, exactly right and contrasts with the wholly mistaken view taken by the court in R (Smith) v Land Registry (Peterborough) [2009] EWHC 328 (Admin). [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:01 pm
We affirm. * * * In summary, we conclude that the laser hair removal treatment administered by Roschek did not constitute health care with the meaning of the Medical Malpractice Act, and the trial court did not err in denying Ob-Gyn‟s motion to dismiss.NFP civil opinions today (10): Mary Ann Smith-Dobben v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 10:14 am by Lyle Denniston
  Those odd cross-currents marked the argument in the case of Plumhoff v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 5:57 am by Kalvis Golde
Shapiro disagreed with Smith’s assertion that Citizens United was based on novel fact-finding by Kennedy, characterizing the decision as an analysis, “grounded in law,” about what the text of the Constitution does or does not allow. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
In Mosley at para 229 Eady J directed himself to take into account awards in defamation cases, and referred also to Gleaner Company Ltd v Abrahams [2004] 1 AC 628. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 12:05 pm by Amy Howe
Smith (April 17): When the statute of limitations begins to run for a federal civil rights claim alleging that prosecutors fabricated evidence in a criminal proceeding Food Marketing Institute v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 3:50 am by Peter Mahler
Platkin decided Flink v Smith, 2020 NY Slip Op 50305(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Feb. 7, 2020], involving a dispute between former law partners following the collapse of their PLLC known as Flink Smith Law (FSL). [read post]