Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 7,398
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am
Works of Malcom X, T.S.Eliot, Winston Churchill became copyright-free, at least in some countries. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:29 pm
Even if ideology (or pragmatism) sometimes does not seem to matter, it still continues to linger in the background both shaping and guiding thinking. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 10:05 pm
I measure the Apple adapter at about 1 3/4" x 1 3/4". [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 10:36 am
Does the former cover the latter? [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 10:26 am
Obviously (and as I am sure he agrees), the problems that concern him are still there, even if deferral is a free option, if forced repatriation might (and sometimes does) occur at some point. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 9:37 am
And once it does so, there is no vigilantism — you now have the permission of the law to do x. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:55 am
This reverse Dorian Gray - you can see in his face how little thought, care, and character he has - it's too empty and unlived in, hence the opposite of the Oscar Wilde character (as revealed in the painting) who has erred in the other direction - has put out proposals that I believe are not on balance worth taking seriously on any ground other than that he might win (which does not currently appear to be likely). [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 1:33 pm
" I found the Board's explanation for non-obviousness to be persuasive, because instead of simply listing differences, they put these differences in context: Yes, reference X taught A and B, but not in the context of C. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 1:33 pm
" I found the Board's explanation for non-obviousness to be persuasive, because instead of simply listing differences, they put these differences in context: Yes, reference X taught A and B, but not in the context of C. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to readers of this site. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:24 am
If we do this, in a dystopian future that resembles an X-Files episode, the government could make us embed nefarious surveillance features too. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 7:19 am
I’ve written previously about the purpose and legal effect of division orders, and you can read that post here. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:09 pm
If I take action to accomplish X, and in the course of acting, Y also happens, and I knew Y would happen if I took I tried to accomplish X, does that mean I intended Y to happen? [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 12:57 pm
Is that because they care more about their customers’ privacy than Apple does? [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 6:21 am
I usually add language that the client has "already provided for X to his satisfaction and X is not to receive anything further directly or indirectly from the estate" of the client. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 6:57 pm
Is that because they care more about their customers’ privacy than Apple does? [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 6:37 am
Brand X Internet Servs. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 2:44 pm
” The fact that the safe is opened by speech does not automatically bring the First Amendment into play. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:15 am
Everything anybody does prevents them from doing other things. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 6:40 am
Reading the Rules of Civil Procedure is a bit like reading the dictionary—hardly anyone does it for fun. [read post]
