Search for: "Does 1 - 33" Results 3061 - 3080 of 6,149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2016, 7:34 am
It will also not cover people residing in Jammu & Kashmir.Problem areas in the Aadhaar BillThe Aadhaar Bill is flawed, fundamentally, in several ways.1) Lack of uniformity of purpose of Aadhaar: The Aadhaar Bill does not contain a Preamble. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 11:21 am by Kraft Palmer Davies, PLLC
Co., 860 F.2d 30, 33, 1989 AMC 1 (2d Cir. 1988) (“maritime law policy . . . calls for prompt and voluntary payment of maintenance and cure”). [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 11:21 am by Kraft Palmer Davies, PLLC
Co., 860 F.2d 30, 33, 1989 AMC 1 (2d Cir. 1988) (“maritime law policy . . . calls for prompt and voluntary payment of maintenance and cure”). [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:50 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
They wanted 33 percent of the settlement fund, the usual contingency rate. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 7:22 am by Michael Geist
EFF argues that the change has enormous implications: What does this surreptitious change from “paragraph” to “subparagraph” mean? [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 6:05 am by Michael Geist
Unlike the limitations and exceptions provisions, this is not a limitation or exception as it does not envision the possibility of permitting a user to circumvent a digital lock. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 6:05 am by Michael Geist
The TPP does not include an exception for private purposes circumvention. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:02 am by Michael Geist
The TPP excludes existing local government regulation from the scope of the four big service requirements in Article 10.7 (1)(a)(iii). [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Securities Act of 1933 does not permit the SEC to bring an enforcement action on behalf of an individual investor; however, individual investors are permitted to bring civil actions under several of its sections as noted below:   ■ Section 5 and Section 12(a)(1) allow purchasers (investors) to sue issuers for offering or selling a non-exempt security without registering it. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 10:31 am by Dennis Crouch
We conclude that the CFC erred in holding reissue claims 1–22 and 33–38 invalid for failure to meet the written description requirement of section 112. [read post]