Search for: "Does 1 to 50 "
Results 3061 - 3080
of 14,416
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2011, 10:42 am
The data in the below tables and in the detailed chart does not include companies conducting Say-On-Pay votes that are mandated by virtue of the company's participation in the Troubled Asset Relief Program and also does not include companies that voluntarily held Say-On-Pay votes (e.g., companies which held their annual shareholder meeting shortly before the January 21, 2011 effective date for Say-On-Pay but which nevertheless opted to voluntarily hold a Say-On-Pay… [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:13 am
Rul. 68-145, 1968-1 CB 203. [read post]
2 May 2014, 11:35 am
It does not get any better than that. [read post]
7 May 2025, 11:51 am
Wachtell has “only” 265 attorneys and does not fit the 501+ category of employment. [read post]
7 May 2025, 11:51 am
Wachtell has “only” 265 attorneys and does not fit the 501+ category of employment. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:32 pm
Swiss law does not provide specific rules for the liability of intermediaries in copyright cases; the Court therefore examined Art. 50 of the Swiss “Obligationenrecht”, which regulates the liability of more than one party in tort and is generally applied to civil (and copyright) cases as well. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 1:00 pm
Based Sectors in China: What Role Does International Investment Law Play? [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
The rule does not say (and does not need to say) what the consequence will be of an applicant not taking the opportunity to restrict the claims. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
: 1 Case; Procedure / Standing: 6 Cases; Eligibility (AmAxle Redux): 3 Cases; and Randomness (don’t bother with these): 2 Cases 1. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 3:23 am
[11] Id. at 50 [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:29 pm
Limits on overlimit fees could go much farther, though, starting with limiting the number of overlimit fees in a cycle (5 fees on 5 overlimit transactions of $10 each versus 1 overlimit fee on 1 transaction of $50). [read post]
16 May 2008, 3:05 pm
Accordingly, this new legislation does not apply to any motor vehicle accidents which took place prior to January 1, 2009. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:21 am
The amount of time, money, and attention we lavish on our pets is also unparalleled as the following statistics illustrate: Each year, Americans spend $50 billion on their pets 1 in 3 Americans admits to giving their dog a birthday present 1 in 4 has paid for professional photographs of their furry family member 9 out of 10 Americans consider their pet to be part of the family It is readily apparent from these facts and figures that Americans have a unique… [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 6:43 pm
Two sub-questions follow: (1) how does that embedding shape the character of social credit ‘as’ or ‘in’ the cage of regulation through which the rule of law structures of Chinese constitutionalism are ordered; and (2) in what ways does the implementation of social credit through platforms change or displace traditional forms of the administration of law. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
In his statement dissenting from the Proposed Rule, Vice Chairman Travis Hill summarized the likely practical procedural effect of these changes: “Given (1) the number of deposit arrangements that may be newly scoped in by the rule, (2) the more subjective standard by which the FDIC will judge applications, and (3) the lack of grandfathering of existing arrangements, I suspect an enormous avalanche of applications may hit the FDIC on day 1, which the agency is completely… [read post]
25 May 2009, 1:23 pm
"We are putting in jeopardy gains that have resulted in crime plunging in L.A. to its lowest level in 50 years. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 10:19 am
Which reminds me of one of my favorite Stan Freberg songs taken from Stan Freberg (Modestly) Presents the United States of America, Vol. 1,' a 50-minute Broadway musical for the ear with songs and sketches by Mr. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:58 pm
What does that mean? [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 5:00 am
But it’s a bad thing if the policy does not clearly tell the employees what they can do and what they can’t do. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 8:49 am
SB 283 – Relating to the offense of unlawfully prohibiting an employee from voting. * The information was originally compiled by the Texas Workforce Commission and all bills have an effective date of September 1, 2017 unless otherwise noted. [read post]
