Search for: "FRANKS v. STATE" Results 3061 - 3080 of 4,748
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2012, 5:16 am by Doug Cornelius
The Delaware court sets the standard of review using the the four-factor formula set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Reves v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:25 am by WSLL
Currency totaling $7,209.00: Libretti v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:08 am by Charon QC
Lawcast 203:  Kristen Heimark – From serving on the USS Lexington to practising as a London lawyer Today I am talking to Kristen Heimark, a practising lawyer in London  who started her working life serving with the United States Navy on the USS Lexington. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm by John Elwood
Next up is yet another state-on-top habeas case, Howes v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:17 am by Andy Dorchak
The Ohio Supreme Court found the state’s process of school funding (using residual general Assembly funds supplemented by local (real property) tax revenues) to be unconstitutional in DeRolph v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act and related regulation will likely have a significant impact on both financial and nonfinancial end-users. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and anor, Lukaszewski v The District Court in Torun, Pomiechowski v District Court of Legunica 59-220, R (Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Rozanski v Regional Court 3 Penal Department, and NJDB v JEG and anor. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:44 am by William McGrath
He highlighted language from Supreme Court decisions that "defendants entering into injunctive consent judgments 'often admit to no violation of the law," (U.S. v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
“, I wrote about Oxfam America’s threat to sue the SEC for failing to comply with Congress’ mandate to adopt regulations governing disclosures by resource extraction issuers pursuant to Section 1504 of the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:00 am by Steve Vladeck
And we should hear soon from the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, which heard argument in April in United States v. [read post]