Search for: "Fast v. Fast" Results 3061 - 3080 of 6,850
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2015, 7:08 am by Larry Tolchinsky
Most real estate professionals aren’t trying to pull a fast one and scheming on ways to commit intentional fraud or “fraudulent misrepresentation” just to get a deal done. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:14 am
Even when it comes to government contracting — where the government is choosing how to spend government money — the government generally may not discriminate based on the contractor’s speech, see Board of County Commissioners v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 8:37 am by Joy Waltemath
Further, there was evidence showing that some files could not be conveniently accessed remotely and the pace of work could “sometimes be too fast for anything other than on-site presence. [read post]
You’ve likely heard of the famous McDonald’s “hot coffee” case, in which 79-year-old Stella Liebeck – in Liebeck v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 6:26 pm by Joy Waltemath
Reversing and remanding the decision of the court below, the appeals court found that his age-related comments were sufficiently related to the decisional process to constitute direct evidence of discrimination (Thomas v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am by Bill Marler
COLI O157:H7 BACTERIA Sources, Characteristics, and Identification E. coli O157:H7 is one of hundreds of strains of the bacterium Escherichia coli.[1] Most strains of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and animals.[2] The E. coli bacterium is among the most extensively studied microorganism.[3] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific markers found on its surface and distinguishes it from other… [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 2:35 am
The case of Target Australia Pty Ltd v Catchoftheday.com.au Pty Ltd [2015] ATMO 54, decided in June, aimed to answer this question in the fair land of Australia. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 11:27 am by John McFarland
Chesapeake is settling cases as fast as it can. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:00 pm
More importantly, it’s unclear how the administration can legally and properly deter people from seeking protection in the first place: As the judge in RILR v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Quick answer: no” [David Henderson; WSJ/@scottlincicome on seasonal pool-supply company] Hillary Clinton and the Market Basket Stores myth [James Taranto] Labor Department proposes tightening regulation of retirement financial advisers [Kenneth Bentsen, The Hill] Proposed: “well-orchestrated” state ballot initiatives aimed at overturning employment at will [Rand Wilson, Workplace Fairness] My view: “Everybody wins with at-will employment” [Ethan Blevins, Pacific… [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 4:27 am by Andres
The legal principle in this respect was established in CBS Songs v Amstrad. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Parodies v. satires—cases are almost entirely wrong. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark David Fontaine It is well understood by now that cyber security is a concern for every organization and that it is an issue on which every company’s board should be focused. [read post]