Search for: "Foster v. US" Results 3061 - 3080 of 3,571
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer)   US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer)   US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:55 am by Russ Bensing
In my Case Update on Monday, I’d mentioned in passing the 2nd District’s decision in State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 6:53 pm by Renee Newman Knake
  First, the Court held that the term "debt relief agencies" as used in the Bankruptcy Abuse and Reform Act of 2005 includes attorneys. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:57 pm by Melinda Deel
The second independent semi-annual monitoring report to Judge Nancy Edmunds pursuant to the 2008 settlement in Dwayne B. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 8:36 am by David
  In the Animal Legal Defense Fund v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:15 am
But even in criminal proceedings account must be taken of the article 8 rights of the perceived victim: see SN v Sweden, App no 34209/96, 2 July 2002. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:46 am by John L. Welch
"].March 30, 2010 - 2 PM: In re Foster's Wine Estates Americas Company, Serial No. 77018496 [Appeal from an objection to Applicant's specimen of use (a catalog) for the mark CELLULAR 360 for wine].Text Copyright John L. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 11:21 pm by shirley
In the matter of Smuts v Booyens; Markplaas (Edms) Bpk and Another v Booysens [2001] ZASCA 57 (also 2001 (4) SA 15 (A)) the court held that the word “transfer” consisted of a number of steps within a private company setting: (a) an agreement to transfer, (b) the execution of the transfer document, and (c) registration of transfer. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 8:34 am by Hull & Hull LLP
  Sharon Davis:   And certainly that was the case in the Fiaco v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 1:40 pm by Eric
This argument is consistent with traditional tort principles (as well as Judge Kozinski’s dissent in Perfect 10 v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 12:11 pm by Michael Ginsborg
One would outlaw the use of precedent; another would require election of judges. [read post]