Search for: "Frank v. State"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 4,737
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2012, 3:07 pm
Frank L. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:17 am
The Ohio Supreme Court found the state’s process of school funding (using residual general Assembly funds supplemented by local (real property) tax revenues) to be unconstitutional in DeRolph v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:23 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:00 am
Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act and related regulation will likely have a significant impact on both financial and nonfinancial end-users. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and anor, Lukaszewski v The District Court in Torun, Pomiechowski v District Court of Legunica 59-220, R (Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Rozanski v Regional Court 3 Penal Department, and NJDB v JEG and anor. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:44 am
He highlighted language from Supreme Court decisions that "defendants entering into injunctive consent judgments 'often admit to no violation of the law," (U.S. v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 2:00 am
“, I wrote about Oxfam America’s threat to sue the SEC for failing to comply with Congress’ mandate to adopt regulations governing disclosures by resource extraction issuers pursuant to Section 1504 of the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:00 am
And we should hear soon from the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, which heard argument in April in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:54 pm
Frank, Steven M. [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:54 pm
Frank, Steven M. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:28 pm
Frank, Steven M. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:57 am
” In re Mitchell W., supra (quoting In re Frank V., 233 Cal. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:32 am
" The case cite is Gaylord v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:31 pm
It probably only reflects the position as it would have been found to exist at common law (see Vassiliev v Frank Cass & Co Ltd [2003] EWHC 1428 (QB) – in which qualified privilege was found partly on the basis of the journal having an “exclusive readership”). [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:00 am
So the researchers hypothesized that these awake ripple states are required for memory-guided decision-making. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:50 am
A recent California appellate court decision (People v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
Resolved cases include: Mr Stephen Wren v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; A man v The Sun (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 11/05/2012; Ms Louise Pyne v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 08/05/2012. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:16 am
’ Shields Pork Plus, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:25 am
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and anor, heard 20 – 29 February 2012. [read post]
13 May 2012, 2:02 pm
She considers such cases as Hatton v United Kingdom, Lopez Ostra v. [read post]
