Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 61,431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2019, 10:01 am
In Clinton v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 11:30 am
United States, No. 06-1976 (4th Cir.),... [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm
On 18 June 2014 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 6:04 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 8:01 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court granted the writ of certiori in the case of Bullard v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 9:36 am
State Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:31 am
I can state with near certainty that the California Supreme Court will grant review of this opinion.There's basically no choice. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 7:21 am
The state specifically mentions United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 3:30 pm
As discussed in a new post over at the Sacramentorium, today's update to CAAF's daily docket includes grants in a couple of trailer cases to United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:17 am
V. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:36 pm
In Masimo Corporation v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 6:49 am
State v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 12:45 pm
Transfers have been granted today by the Supreme Court in three cases: Emma McPeek v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:37 pm
” Pfeiffer v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 6:15 am
See Kavrakis v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:17 pm
On Monday, the Court granted three new cases and invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in one case. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 1:03 pm
This morning, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in a Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act decision out of the Ninth Circuit: Roberts v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 10:24 am
"Having granted the courts the authority to review state convictions under our habeas powers, it seems to me inconsistent with our fundamental obligations as judges to require us, except in unusual or exceptional circumstances, to rule for the state regardless of whether it violated the Constitution. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:16 am
US v. [read post]
