Search for: "House v. Close"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 7,547
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2016, 1:16 pm
came close to crashing down Thursday in a Supreme Court decision so brief that it was barely mentioned by Chief Justice John G. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:16 am
In Matter of Youngewirth v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:16 am
In Matter of Youngewirth v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:34 pm
A Government e-petition in November 2011 calling for Mr Ahmad to be tried in the UK was closed with over 140,000 signatures. [read post]
18 May 2012, 7:56 pm
In addition, the plaintiff owned land “in close proximity” to the tabernacle and youth chapel that included a lake, “a fellowship center building, picnic area, boat docks, bath house, bathing beach, playground, and horseshoe and badminton courts. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
In the arguments, the justices focused little on the facts of the current case, Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
28 May 2006, 9:19 pm
Monette-Shaw v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:03 pm
Bonta – The Impact of Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 5:50 pm
In Lawson v Serco Ltd (Crofts) [2006] UKHL 3, [2006] 1 All ER 823, the House of Lords held that the right not to be unfairly dismissed under the Employment Rights Act 1996 (UK) applied to UK-based pilots of Cathay Pacific. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 3:50 am
Periods of tightening include the 1980s when the House of Lords developed the notion of “procedural exclusivity” in O’Reilly v Mackman [1983] 2 AC 237, which required public law challenges ordinarily to be pursued via judicial review proceedings. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 4:20 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:57 pm
Freeport Pancake House for guidance. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 2:59 am
Oakley, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 9:28 am
However, missing from the decision was a consideration of the argument that the individual components of the Subject Mark were actually used in close proximity with each other. [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:49 pm
Steve Vladeck and Benjamin Wittes argued that important caveats to the Nixon v. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 9:36 am
The Justices say the executive order singles out houses of worship "for especially harsh treatment. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:47 pm
I don't mean to say that the ruling is a house of cards, but Judge Koh applied the "causal nexus" part of the Galaxy Nexus appeals ruling extremely strictly and very much to Apple's disadvantage, so if that basis is modified, the entire house on top of it may have to be rebuilt as well.So what could happen procedurally in this scenario of a standard that would make an injunction more available to Apple than the original (pre-rehearing) Galaxy Nexus ruling? [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 3:10 am
Yesterday the initial determination on remand came down in the Motorola v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 2:20 am
First, the document:DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:40 pm
Connick v. [read post]
