Search for: "In Re CAL"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 5,812
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2016, 12:00 am
Superior Court, 36 Cal.4th 148 (Cal. 2005). [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Res. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:45 am
We’re referring to Dennis v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:47 pm
Ain't going to look good on your resume.Though, remember, you're still a faculty member. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 1:24 pm
And if you do, don't be surprised when you're held to them. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 12:36 pm
At least if you're smart about it.So good job Court of Appeal. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 10:36 am
But they're reversed on appeal. [read post]
5 Jun 2025, 9:38 am
He first told the protester that mall security told them to leave, and if they didn't do so voluntarily:“You’ll be ejected for the day” since “it’s their property [so] they’re allowed to do that [and] we don’t want to get into any trespassing issues here . . . because if a private place tells you to leave . . . then refusal to do so is 602.1(a) of the Penal Code. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 4:40 pm
For now, at least, you're absolutely immune. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 11:53 am
Regardless of which side you're on. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 11:16 am
., misdemeanors prosecuted by the City Attorney's Office): rather, we're talking about big-ticket civil litigations. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:07 am
So the question is whether you can waive those rights as part of an arbitration agreement, or whether such a waiver is instead against public policy.The Court holds in favor of the employee, concluding that they're invalid. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
And that's 5 minutes of my life I'll never get back.I'm sure if you're a California meritime insurance lawyer, you'll want to read this one. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 11:56 am
You can't sue the Barona Tribe in state court even if you're injured at their casino and even if they've agreed -- as they did pursuant to the compact with the State of California that enabled the tribe to build and run the casino -- to waive their sovereign immunity to suit in certain circumstances. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:25 pm
Cal. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 4:01 pm
Under my rule, we'd allow all of these parties to file anti-SLAPP motions not because they're fictional and have "shape-shifted" to a different entity, but rather because they're being sued in essentially a representative capacity.Let me give you an example. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 9:24 pm
I mean, sure, I bet they're bummed. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 11:20 am
Cal. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 11:51 am
” - Estate of Stoker, 193 Cal. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 3:22 pm
Cal. 2011)(consolidated with two related appeals, affirming the bankruptcy court's opinion at In re Bertuccio, 414 B.R 604 (Bankr. [read post]
