Search for: "Johns v. State"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 22,318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2022, 3:58 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
DeWolf, Appellant, v John Wirenius, as FOIL Appeals Officer, et al., Respondents. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
DeWolf, Appellant, v John Wirenius, as FOIL Appeals Officer, et al., Respondents. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 2:38 pm
Ashcroft v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 8:30 am
Adolph with lead counsel, CAAFlog commenter John O'Connor. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 7:41 am
--Court: United States District Court for the District of DelawareOpinion Date: 1/14/10Cite: Mattern & Associates, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 11:33 am
New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 11:23 am
The post Samsung V. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:25 pm
” Boardwalk Prop., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:16 am
New York State's Appellate Division, First Department, in VOOM HD Holdings LLC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:03 pm
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 12:08 pm
John M. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:55 am
Today’s Supreme Court decision in Bond v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 10:56 am
Matthew John Ryan and Prime Rate And Return, LLC, individually and doing business as American Integrity Financial Co.Case number: 10-cv-0513 (United States District Court for the Northern District of New York)Case filed: May 3, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 2, 2013 5/17/2013 8/15/2013 2013-47 SEC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 9:24 am
And in the justices’ private conference room, Chief Justice John Roberts has chosen to hang portraits of John Marshall, Benjamin Cardozo, a John Marshall Harlan (wagers as to which one?) [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
Carla & John Jackson, an 11-page opinion, CJ Baker writes:Appellant Erikka Gillis appeals the trial court's order denying her motion to withdraw her consent to the adoption of her child, N.J.G., by appellees-petitioners Carla Jackson and John Jackson. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 11:53 am
Circuit’s Guantanamo detention saga: Suleiman v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 5:14 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) James Lewis v. [read post]
