Search for: "Jones v. District Court"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 3,121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2007, 12:52 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKAdmiraltySelection of England as Forum Did Not Divest Court Of Jurisdiction to Enter, Enforce Attachment Order Consub Delaware LLC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 3:05 pm
But, as is so often true in Supreme Court cases, the arguments in Scott v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 10:37 am
February 20, 2007).* District court was justified in basing its credibility determination on impeaching defendant's witness at suppression hearing with grand jury testimony. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 3:54 am
Jones Eastern District of Kentucky at London D. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 9:00 pm
Vasquez, and S141753 Jones v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 2:58 am
Pacific Power & Light Co., Jones v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 1:05 pm
The Utah Supreme Court dealt a set-back to same-sex co-parent rights in that state with a 4-1 ruling in Jones v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 1:04 pm
Jones, 44 F.3d 860, 871 (10th Cir. 1995); United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 12:22 pm
Jones, 239 F.3d at 720. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 4:10 am
Jones, 44 F.3d 871 (citing United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
The Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 1:49 am
Although Appellant did not comply 100% with the directives of the district court and the supervising DFS case worker, even the district court conceded that her efforts were to a large extent successful. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 9:21 am
Jones as involving statutory interpretation rather than a statement of constitutional doctrine and United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 8:45 pm
The Voluntary Trade Blog reports that FTC Commissioner William Kovacic, in a recent interview with Dow Jones, harshly critized the Department of Justice for advising the Supreme Court not to take the FTC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 12:33 am
Cecil Jones, appellant pro se. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 5:12 am
Mercante, a partner at Rubin, Fiorella & Friedman, analyze the recent Supreme Court decision in Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 4:42 am
The district court's order for a new trial on Counts One and Three should be reversed. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
In Lyons, the court amended an opinion to state without citation: "The argument that the district court should have imposed a 'beyond a reasonable doubt' standard is foreclosed by our case law. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 5:31 pm
As the ILB reported on Jan. 10th, "The General Assembly is now weighing in on the Court of Appeals ruling in Bruce Jones v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 11:18 am
United States v. [read post]
