Search for: "Land v. United States" Results 3061 - 3080 of 6,678
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2016, 6:30 am by John McFarland
Water from the aquifer has made the arid high plains one of the most prolific agricultural regions of the United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:01 am by SHG
 USA Today’s Brad Heath twitted a great quote** from United States v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 9:20 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Because the federal government has defined the “waters of the United States” to include wetlands. [read post]
31 May 2016, 8:33 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Tuesday in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
29 May 2016, 7:42 pm by Patricia Salkin
The United States District Court granted Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment stating that Defendant’s denial of Plaintiff’s application did not have the effect of prohibiting services and it was based on substantial evidence. [read post]
26 May 2016, 9:29 pm by Ron Coleman
Speakers: Glynn Lunney, Texas A&M University School of Law (United States) vs. [read post]
26 May 2016, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
This case was tried before a federal jury in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois at East St. [read post]
26 May 2016, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
This case was tried before a federal jury in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois at East St. [read post]
25 May 2016, 1:39 pm by Olivier Moréteau
, Olivier Moréteau, Louisiana State University (United States)V.B         Diverse in Unity? [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:30 pm by Rory Little
Meanwhile, modern precedents such as the Court’s 1971 decision in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:24 am
Maintenance and Cure Defined Unlike land-based employment law, a sick or injured seaman is not entitled to a state workers' compensation. [read post]
14 May 2016, 8:27 am by John Floyd
United States by holding that Johnson pronounced “a substantive new rule” of law and, therefore, was retroactive. [read post]
9 May 2016, 2:16 pm by Giles Peaker
On the other hand, The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples meant that the protestors had a right to maintain a spiritual relation with traditionally occupied land, or to occupy traditionally occupied land or have redress for confiscated land, or something. [read post]