Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 3061 - 3080 of 7,590
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 11:41 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Wright II granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment in a set of claims concerning ICE’s “knock-and-talk” practice in Kidd v Mayorkas , a class action lawsuit challenging ICE’s deceptive home arrest practices in Los Angeles and the surrounding region. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:51 am
Eastern University, in Pennsylvania, lays claim to that phrase, again for uses in connection with educational services". [read post]
25 May 2021, 6:20 am by Stewart Baker
I point out that American policyholders seem to share this enthusiasm, at least judging from the questions the presiding judge in Epic v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 9:49 pm by Mark Summerfield
In a unanimous decision – Commissioner of Patents v Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd [2021] FCAFC 202 – a Full Bench of three judges (Middleton, Perram and Nicholas JJ) of the Federal Court of Australia (‘Full Court’) has reversed last year’s ruling by Justice Burley that claims directed to a so-called ‘feature game’ implemented on an electronic gaming machine (EGM) constituted a patent-eligible ‘manner of manufacture’ under… [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:45 am by Jeremy
This morning the Court of Justice of the European Union gave judgment in Case C-435/12 ACI Adam BV and Others v Stichting de Thuiskopie, Stichting Onderhandelingen Thuiskopie vergoeding. [read post]
31 May 2018, 6:31 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals upholds the trial court's post-trial order that stands firm on the pyrrhic verdict.The case is Ali v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:26 am
May the rights which the Member States lay down pursuant to Article 5(3)(n) of Directive 2001/29/EC go so far as to enable users of the terminals to print out on paper or store on a USB stick the works made available there? [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 10:59 am by Jeremy Malcolm and Mitch Stoltz
Related Issues: Digital VideoInnovationBroadcasting TreatyWIPORelated Cases: WNET v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 9:23 am by jmalcolm
Yet in the 2013 Kirtsaeng v Wiley case, such parallel importation was found legal. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 1:30 pm
Illinois’ and Vermont’s bills both recognize abortion and other reproductive rights as “fundamental,” ensuring that they will remain protected in those states, regardless of what happens to Roe v. [read post]