Search for: "Levi v Levi" Results 3061 - 3080 of 3,414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm by Sri Medicherla
Uriel-Charles discussed the 1960 Supreme Court case Gomillion v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:58 am by Amy Howe
The government recommended a grant in Thole v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation At an EU level the introduction of amendments to copyright law will levy a link tax and charges search engines providing access to copyrighted materials. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 5:49 am by Matthew Weybrecht
One of the most famous and compelling defenses of the unitary executive comes from Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 11:31 am by Hayley Evans, Shannon Togawa Mercer
Chapter V of GDPR governs the legality of transfers of personal data to third countries and allows for the transfer of data to a third country when the EC decides that “a third country...ensures an adequate level of protection” or when there are appropriate safeguards in place. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:58 am
  Ironically, one of the cases cited for “these standards” was Carrera v. [read post]
Yesterday’s violent storming of the Capitol building raises questions about President Trump’s fitness to see out the remaining two weeks of his term; about whether large parts of the Republican Party remain committed to even basic norms of democratic government; and about how the country should move on from this brazen attack on the peaceful transition of power. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 11:10 am by Howard Knopf
I debated this and related points with AC’s CEO Roanie Levy over a year ago at Brock University.Instead, it is pressing ahead for a consolidated blanket license-based tariff hearing and seeking some arguably highly overreaching tariff rates for rights that it arguably doesn’t have for repertoire that it arguably doesn’t have – and, of course, wants these tariffs to be retroactive and “mandatory”. [read post]
14 May 2019, 2:55 am by Jon L. Gelman
The NJ Senate then took action.Conditional Veto StatementPursuant to Article V, Section I, Paragraph 14 of the New Jersey Constitution, I am returning Senate Bill No. 1967 (First Reprint) with my recommendations for reconsideration. [read post]