Search for: "Long v. United States"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 20,231
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2015, 6:01 pm
United States (the anti-commandeering principle)Clinton v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:44 am
United States for a while now. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm
By the 1950s, the persistence of laws codifying racial subordination had become an embarrassment for the United States on the global stage. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 10:35 am
(Weirdly appropriate, for a “crack” case . . .)United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:17 am
The nation-to-nation relationship we enjoy as tribal nations has never been confined to the borders of the United States. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am
Chinese companies, backed with every advantage the state can provide, must venture out into the world to lock down long-term access to the crude oil, natural gas, metals, minerals, and other commodities needed to fuel a still-vulnerable developing economy. . . . [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 4:43 pm
United States, No. 19-783, 2021 WL 2229206 (U.S. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 6:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
”This conception of clemency is continuous with a line of cases going back to the first United States Supreme Court case on clemency in 1833.That case, United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:46 am
I’m the President of the United States of America. [read post]
6 Feb 2025, 6:00 am
Such an argument could affect a raft of other operations and legal questions that have arisen in the DOD law of war detention context where the U.S. government has long fought the application of U.S. law at Guantanamo (and long argued that it is not the United States). [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 10:30 pm
” United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 5:20 am
" State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 3:39 pm
United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 3:16 am
In Grotian fashion, coastal states near whose waters such research might be conducted by other states -- the Insight mentions Peru and Argentina -- maintain that the Argo float and similar research activities fall within the United Nations' regulatory structure established by the 1982 U.N. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
The revival of Section 502B is long overdue. [read post]
