Search for: "MATTER OF C A"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 36,760
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2023, 4:31 am
According to two sources familiar with the matter, Gaetz has been furious at McCarthy for the perceived lack of support [when he was 'the target of a federal investigation into the sex trafficking of a minor']— despite the fact that McCarthy did not strip him of any committee assignments during the probe. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:07 pm
As an initial matter, it purports to allow ATF—rather than Congress—to set forth the scope of criminal prohibitions. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 3:00 am
Bankman-Fried’s spending helped support CLC Action, a 501(c)(4), as well as the ethics watchdog’s tax-exempt charitable arm. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm
I quote from my book Corporate Law (Concepts and Insights): No matter how closely one scrutinizes Securities Exchange Act § 14(a), one will not find anything relating to a private party cause of action under the statute or rules. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 11:52 am
by Michael C. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 1:14 pm
§ 1052(a) as well as under Section 2(c) of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 1:14 pm
§ 1052(a) as well as under Section 2(c) of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 7:54 am
by Michael C. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 7:37 am
When donations or recommended donations are made, any amount deducted and not passed on to charitable organizations constitutes a fee, and it does not matter if a fee is deducted before or after donated funds are sent to charitable organizations. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 11:01 am
” Why does this matter? [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 9:50 am
So I think this means that an employer's saying, "don't hire this person, he stole from us," is qualifiedly privileged, which is to say that the employer is immune if it made an honest even if unreasonable mistake in investigating the matter; an employer's saying, "don't hire this person, he sexually harassed a coworker," is qualifiedly privileged; an employer's saying, "don't hire this person, he had posted racist messages on… [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 8:25 am
by Michael C. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Federation and Secession, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:01 am
According to § 230, ISPs cannot be made responsible for the content posted by users of the service (§230(c)(1)) regardless of knowledge of its illegality. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
Code, § 9112(c); Pub. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
In the case of law departments, active and sustained C-Suite intervention. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
One cannot answer that question strictly as a matter of public policy because the First Amendment right to free speech places limits on government’s power to make lying a crime.In United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 2:54 pm
R. 214(c) People happily perjure themselves every day by signing affidavits of completeness when they have not completely answered the discovery request. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 12:25 pm
Moreover, it is not settled that even a developed nation can attain Net Zero economy wide, or for that matter a state or other political subdivision, or even a business. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
One Sunday each month we bring you a summary from Supreme Advocacy LLP of recent decisions at the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
