Search for: "MATTER OF H D" Results 3061 - 3080 of 3,841
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2010, 4:47 am by Falk Metzler
While a claimed subject-matter is, as a whole, considered not patentable in the sense of Art. 52 EPC if no technical problem can be derived from that claim at all (cf. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
A 84 stipulates that the claims shall define the matter for which protection is sought. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:32 pm by Ryan Venables
s. 210. (1) Every one who keeps a common bawdy-house is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years. (2) Every one who is an inmate of a common bawdy-house, is found, without lawful excuse, in a common bawdy-house, or as owner, landlord, lessor, tenant, occupier, agent or otherwise having charge or control of any place, knowingly permits the place or any part thereof to be let or used for the purposes of a common bawdy-house, is guilty of an offence… [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm by NL
However, the Court of Appeal decided that a) the matter was of wider public interest and b) given that the appellant’s current AST was shortly to end, there was a [surely slim] possibility that Enfield would find that the chain of causation hadn’t been broken and that the appellant and his wife remained intentionally homeless, as per their review decision under appeal. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 8:02 pm by Melinda Deel
The trial court found that both MCL 712A.19(b)(3)(c)(i) and MCL 712A.19(b)(3)(h) had been proven and that it was in the child’s best interests to terminate his father’s rights. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 1:29 am by Kevin LaCroix
Copies of the letter were sent to the company’s primary and first level excess D&O insurers. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 7:45 pm by cdw
LEXIS 468 (Ark 10/7/2010) Relief denied on claims “that the circuit court erred in (1) denying his motion for directed verdict, (2) refusing to declare Christina Head an accomplice as a matter of law and refusing to submit the issue to the jury, (3) denying his motion to quash the felony information based on the unconstitutionality of the death penalty statute, and (4) allowing prosecutorial misconduct. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 7:20 am by emagraken
Earlier this year I discussed some matters clients should consider prior to firing a personal injury lawyer who was hired on a contingency fee basis. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 10:09 pm by lawmrh
(d) The judiciary’s auditing procedures are not sufficient to oversee all guardianships and conservatorships. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 12:01 am by John Steele
Law Firm Risk Management Blog takes a closer look at the disqualification we previously mentioned, where Winston Strawn was DQ'd from defending Pfizer in a $1 billion matter. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 3:13 am by J.E. Alvarez
Alvarez In the same month that I traveled to Barcelona, I went to Paris to attend a conference organized by Paris I Professors Emmanuelle Jouannet and Hélène Ruiz Fabri and Professor Mark Toufayan of the University of Ottawa. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 12:37 pm by James Edward Maule
Consider, for example, the difficulties faced by low-income individuals when dealing with government-controlled child support and custody matters. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:28 am by Keith Kanouse
(h) Many states regulate the franchise relationship, even though these states do not have any franchise disclosure and registration laws. [read post]