Search for: "Mark London" Results 3061 - 3080 of 4,152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2011, 10:06 am by Josh Wright
The scientific committee for the conference is: Mark Armstrong (University College London) David Dranove (Northwestern – Kellogg) Aviv Nevo (Northwestern) Nancy Rose (MIT) Organizer: Chris Adams (FTC) The conference will be held at the Federal Trade Commission New Jersey Avenue Conference Center, 601 New Jersey Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20001. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Treaty marks a significant step in bilateral cooperation between the United States and India. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
The event, the first of a series of media law seminars, was hosted by the Centre for Commercial Law Studies at Queen Mary, University of London, and the City Law School at City University London. [read post]
4 May 2011, 9:00 pm
Malloy's initial proposal which Mark Robyn and I wrote about in a Fiscal Fact in early March. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:14 pm by George M. Wallace
Mark Davis, is in fact the author of that treatise, now in its 2nd edition and published by Lloyds of London. [read post]
4 May 2011, 6:03 am by Adam Chandler
The other major Court-related story in the news is Prince Charles’s visit to the Court yesterday, just days after his son’s wedding in London. [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:10 am by Laurie Lin
Mark (left) has a law degree from HLS and an undergraduate degree from Columbia. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
Judith Townend, is a freelance journalist and PhD research student at the Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism, City University London. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
(IPBiz) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Despatch Industries – In PV furnace case green patent litigation moves upstream (Green Patent Blog) Heathcote Holdings Corp – False marking Plaintiff’s chosen form not given deference: Heathcote Holdings Corp., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:49 am by RT
But dilution has its own creep—no attorney wants to tell a client “you don’t have the special mark, you just have a mark. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
The difference between s.16 of the 1977 act and s.176 was marked in the statement of this intention. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
The difference between s.16 of the 1977 act and s.176 was marked in the statement of this intention. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 11:46 am by Melissa Morales
The label’s product was later exported to Barney’s New York, Neiman Marcus, Harvey Nichols in London, and Joyce in Hong Kong. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The treaties mark a significant step in bilateral cooperation between the United States and OECS Countries. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Treaty marks a significant step in bilateral cooperation between the United States and Cyprus. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 3:06 pm
In terms of interesting law: • Use of a mark on financial services in the City of London was held to be use of "more than mere local significance" and so could give rise to a prior right to be relied upon in an objection under Article 8(4) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation (CTMR). [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
She can discard her "American lawyer in London" role when she steps off the plane in Dallas and just be someone welcomed home by immigration officials. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm by INFORRM
Judith Townend, is a freelance journalist and PhD research student at the Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism, City University London. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:06 am
 The IPKat thinks it makes a terrific amount of sense for smaller, lower-value intellectual property actions to be heard in Manchester rather than drag the parties and their professional advisers down to London, especially since it's generally cheaper to fly to the Continent from anywhere in England than to take the train to London. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:09 pm
The observations of Mike Lynd (Marks & Clerk) on the increasingly popular practice of registering "partial" trade marks is also worth a read. [read post]